What is most unhealthy: Dr. Pepper, Full Throttle, or a delicious double chocolate chip frappuccino?I have been doing a lot of nutritional study the past week, and reached the horrifying conclusion that those delicious drinks we so often indulge in, are quite more unhealthy than we thought. My study consists of the following nutritional information:(All nutritional facts are based on a 16 fl oz. serving of the listed product)
Product:
Contents: | Dr Pepper | Full Throttle | Double Chocolate Chip Frappuchino (Grande) |
Calories | 200 | 200 | 580 |
Total Fat | 0g | 0g | 22g |
Sodium | 70mg | 140mg | 370mg |
Carbohydrates | 54g | 56g | 86g |
Sugar | 54g | 58g | 65g |
Dietary Fiber | 0g | 0g | 3g |
Vitamins | NONE | Vitamin b6 (20%), Vitamin B12 (10%) | Vitamin A (6%), Calcium (45%), Iron (20%) |
Dr. Pepper SourceFull Throttle SourceStarbucks Frappuccino SourceSo what can be drawn from this is that besides the Sodium (which I would conclude is mostly the excess caffeine in Full Throttle), there is nothing more substantially unhealthy about Full Throttle than there is about Dr. Pepper. Both are made with high fructose corn syrup, which is a disgusting substitute for sugar, that is highly damaging to the liver.The very frightening conclusion from this is learning of the 580 calories in a Grande-sized Starbucks Double-Chocolate Chip frappuccino. In fact, from browsing through the linked source for Starbucks, I found that many of their drinks are very high in calories and carbohydrates. And to think that there was a possibility of such indulgence like Starbucks, without a price. I for one, would like to see Super Size Me 2 take aim at Starbucks. Perhaps a 30-day, all-Starbucks diet?